What is Lateral Movement?

In a security context, lateral movement refers to a technique that enables an attacker to snoop on a VLAN or move through a network in search of data after gaining initial access. It involves techniques that enable a malware, ransomware, or other techniques to progressively move through a network, from one host to another.

These exploits often take advantage of VLAN vulnerabilities, misconfigurations, poor user behavior, and network architecture practices to obtain further access privileges and control. Lateral movement is typically used via internal and external cyberattacks, where the goal is to stay undetected for extended periods of time to maximize the ability to infect other devices, make them inoperable, or steal data.

A Deeper Dive

After an initial breach (a phishing attack or malware infection), attackers use various methods to move “sideways”, impersonating legitimate users to access other systems and data. This issue is that a large percentage of networks, enterprise-class and consumer-grade, are based on VLANs (virtual local area networks). Unfortunately, VLANs were created to break up broadcast domains and not necessarily for security purposes.

 

Lateral movement and the ability for an adversary to exploit other devices connected to the same VLAN is essentially a byproduct of how VLANs work. VLAN Hopping is another common attack method that exploits misconfigured VLANs to bypass security restrictions, allowing attackers to move freely between VLANs.

Lateral Movement Initiated Threats

A variety of negative outcomes can result from an attack that utilizes lateral movement today. The following are a sample of potential threats that are common today.

  • Credential theft and reuse: Attackers steal user credentials (usernames and passwords) and use them to log in to other systems.
  • Privilege escalation: An external or internal adversary attempts to gain higher privileges, such as administrator access, to access more sensitive information.
  • Malware Deployment: An attacker deploys malware on a VLAN and then uses that malware to move to other systems and VLANs.

Because attackers will try to disguise their activities as legitimate user behavior, identifying threats that leverage lateral movement are often very difficult to detect. Per IBM, it takes an average of 277 days to identify an attack, if you have the resources.

How do you prevent lateral movement?

In a perfect world, security awareness and employee training that educates users on identifying phishing attempts and other threats, as well as secure password practices would be sufficient. In the real world other measures leverage modern zero trust principles can prove more effective:

  • Elimination of VLANs: Utilizing network infrastructure that is based on dividing a network into smaller, isolated subnets based on IP addressing, and routers to route traffic between them.
  • Per-endpoint isolation: The placement of user-managed and IoT devices into isolated segments of one to limit the scope of a breach.
  • Strong authentication: Implementation of single sign-on (SSO) and multi-factor authentication (MFA) with strong password policies to reduce credential theft.
How does Nile help?

Nile’s approach to network architecture represents a shift away from traditional VLAN-based segmentation toward a campus-wide Zero Trust model, eliminating key weaknesses associated with legacy networking. Gone are VLANs, complex access control lists (ACLs), and the inherent lateral movement threats common in over 98% of today’s networks.

 

For over 30 years, networking has relied on VLANs, ACLs, and implicit trust models—leading to significant security risks. Nile breaks away from this legacy approach, adopting cloud-like Zero Trust principles for campus networks. This not only simplifies security but also ensures every connection is verified, microsegmented, and protected from lateral movement by design.

Nile Access Service vs. Traditional Network Architecture

Nile Access Service
Traditional Network Architecture
VLAN and Lateral Movement Vulnerabilities

No. VLANs, ACLs and lateral movement eliminated as a core feature.

Yes. Networks are designed with VLANs as a foundation.

Layer 3 Segmentation on Day One

Yes. Nile Access Points and Switches are designed to operate at Layer 3 out-of-the-box.

No. Designed to operate at Layer 2 unless you purchase add-on solutions to upgrade from a Layer 2 implementation to Layer 3.

Segment of One

Yes. Each endpoint is isolated and all traffic is forwarded to an upstream inspection point.

No. Endpoints share a VLAN and all possible threat vectors and can take advantage of VLAN snooping and lateral movement.

Consumption

Layer 3 segmentation and per-endpoint isolation is a core capability.

Can entail separately purchasing add-on systems or solutions to achieve Layer 3 segmentation and segment of one isolation, adding to complexity and cost.

Common Lateral Movement detection methods

Common Lateral Movement detection methods

The tracking of privileged accounts is essential for detecting lateral movement. as adversaries often seek to escalate privileges and use high-level accounts to access additional systems. While Nile includes these capabilities to identify threats, we do suggest that these become common practices for IT organizations that are still using a traditional network architecture based on VLANs and Layer 2 segmentation.

Identify anomalous network traffic

Identify anomalous network traffic

Monitoring network traffic for anomalies is a key method for detecting lateral movement. Unusual patterns, such as increased traffic between internal systems that do not typically communicate or unexpected data transfers, can indicate an attack in progress. Network behavior analysis tools can identify these anomalies by comparing current traffic to established baselines.

Nile provides a capability that detects individual devices that attempt MAC spoofing and will quarantine a device if this activity is identified.

Monitoring of privileged account usage

Monitoring of privileged account usage

Tracking the usage of privileged accounts is essential for detecting lateral movement. Attackers often seek to escalate privileges and use high-level accounts to access additional systems. Monitoring for unusual login attempts, especially from different geographic locations or outside normal working hours, can help identify compromised accounts.

Nile recommends the use of Single Sign-on for user authentication as re-authentication of credentials through the lifecycle of a connection is a standard practice.

Endpoint detection and response (EDR)

Endpoint detection and response (EDR)

The use of EDR solutions provide real-time monitoring and analysis of activities on endpoint devices. These tools can detect suspicious behaviors, such as the execution of uncommon processes, the use of hacking tools, or changes to system configurations. EDR solutions can generate alerts when such activities are detected, enabling quick investigation and response.

Nile suggests the use of solutions like CrowdStrike if using the Nile Access Service or a traditional network architecture with add-on NAC solution.

Log analysis

Log analysis

Comprehensive log analysis is critical for detecting lateral movement. Security information and event management (SIEM) systems aggregate and analyze logs from various sources, such as firewalls, servers, and endpoints. By correlating events across the network, SIEM systems can identify patterns indicative of lateral movement, such as multiple failed login attempts followed by successful ones.

Nile provides built-in SIEM integration with Splunk, but the use of any major SIEM solution is recommended if using the Nile Access Service. It is a must for anyone using a traditional network and legacy architecture.

Entity and User Behavior Analytics (EUBA)

Entity and User Behavior Analytics (EUBA)

Taking advantage of a EUBA (Entity and User Behavior Analytics) solution involves analyzing user or device activities to detect deviations from normal behavior. Machine learning algorithms can establish baselines for individual user behaviors and flag activities that deviate from these norms. For example, if a user account starts accessing files or systems that are atypical for their role, UBA can generate alerts for further investigation.

EUBA solutions are valuable and can be complex and expensive. Nile provides a service that identifies if a specific endpoint device changes its behavior and has the ability to remediate the situation as needed.

Common Lateral Movement detection methods

The tracking of privileged accounts is essential for detecting lateral movement. as adversaries often seek to escalate privileges and use high-level accounts to access additional systems. While Nile includes these capabilities to identify threats, we do suggest that these become common practices for IT organizations that are still using a traditional network architecture based on VLANs and Layer 2 segmentation.

Identify anomalous network traffic

Monitoring network traffic for anomalies is a key method for detecting lateral movement. Unusual patterns, such as increased traffic between internal systems that do not typically communicate or unexpected data transfers, can indicate an attack in progress. Network behavior analysis tools can identify these anomalies by comparing current traffic to established baselines.

Nile provides a capability that detects individual devices that attempt MAC spoofing and will quarantine a device if this activity is identified.

Monitoring of privileged account usage

Tracking the usage of privileged accounts is essential for detecting lateral movement. Attackers often seek to escalate privileges and use high-level accounts to access additional systems. Monitoring for unusual login attempts, especially from different geographic locations or outside normal working hours, can help identify compromised accounts.

Nile recommends the use of Single Sign-on for user authentication as re-authentication of credentials through the lifecycle of a connection is a standard practice.

Endpoint detection and response (EDR)

The use of EDR solutions provide real-time monitoring and analysis of activities on endpoint devices. These tools can detect suspicious behaviors, such as the execution of uncommon processes, the use of hacking tools, or changes to system configurations. EDR solutions can generate alerts when such activities are detected, enabling quick investigation and response.

Nile suggests the use of solutions like CrowdStrike if using the Nile Access Service or a traditional network architecture with add-on NAC solution.

Log analysis

Comprehensive log analysis is critical for detecting lateral movement. Security information and event management (SIEM) systems aggregate and analyze logs from various sources, such as firewalls, servers, and endpoints. By correlating events across the network, SIEM systems can identify patterns indicative of lateral movement, such as multiple failed login attempts followed by successful ones.

Nile provides built-in SIEM integration with Splunk, but the use of any major SIEM solution is recommended if using the Nile Access Service. It is a must for anyone using a traditional network and legacy architecture.

Entity and User Behavior Analytics (EUBA)

Taking advantage of a EUBA (Entity and User Behavior Analytics) solution involves analyzing user or device activities to detect deviations from normal behavior. Machine learning algorithms can establish baselines for individual user behaviors and flag activities that deviate from these norms. For example, if a user account starts accessing files or systems that are atypical for their role, UBA can generate alerts for further investigation.

EUBA solutions are valuable and can be complex and expensive. Nile provides a service that identifies if a specific endpoint device changes its behavior and has the ability to remediate the situation as needed.

cta pattern img

Protect your campus, branch, and remote users with Nile Trust Service